Illegal Illegal Drug Laws

I would posit that many of our nations drug laws are illegal- and that the government has violated their authority in their control.

While there are numerous issues- this conversation is in regards to their Scheduling. Drugs such as marijuana, lsd, psilocybin, and mdma are all schedule I drugs.

So lets look at the requirements for scheduling drugs, according to the law (The controlled substances act):

Schedule I controlled substances

“Placement on schedules; findings required

Except … The findings required for each of the schedules are as follows:

(1) Schedule I.—

(A) The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse.

(B) The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.

(C) There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision.” 

Now first- Alcohol and Tobacco, two of the most addictive and dangerous substances known to man are conveniently exempted from these requirements. Both would clearly (deservingly so) be schedule I drugs under the governments very criteria that is supposed to regulate drugs.

Now abuse is left undefined. But marijuana, LSD, Psilocybin, and MDMA  are either non-addictive, or have a much lower addiction potential then drugs in schedule IV or V.

In the case of marijuana there is a wide body of evidence of its medical uses for numerous conditions, a synthetic version has existed in schedule III for decades, and the government themselves hold patents on the medical use of cannabis, and has issued patents to pharmaceutical companies on medicinal uses. Likewise in recent years the government has approved researchinto the medicinal use of psilocybin amd MDMA for things such as treatment of anxiety in terminal patients and the treatment of PTSD- including in our returning veterans.

Indeed- when the government made MDMA a schedule I drug in 1985- they did so against the recommendation of the scientific pnel tasked to study it, and indeed, against the administrative law judge- both had recommended schedule III. Likewise there was scientific evidence supporting the use of LSD from both Harvard, and the US militaries own experiements in the 60’s.

Oddly enough- it is now easier to get federal approval to do research on the benefits of MDMA and Psilocybin then it is for marijuana.

The evidence is quite clear, and quite disturbing. Many of our drug laws have not been based on science or evidence- as our very laws require. Instead they were based on beliefs or morals all too often by people with no experience with these substances and/or citing falsified evidence.

The drug war has failed, and is largely built on lies. Almost weekly now we are seeing former and current world leaders, drug warriors, drug researchers, scientists… speaking out- that the drug war has been a failure, that many drugs are neither particularly harmful or addictive (David Nutt, at the time the head of the british scientific Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs publicly states a couple years ago that MDMA (ecstasy) was safer then riding a horse. For which he was sacked. And most of the ACMD resigned in protest- forming their own Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs (ISCD) which published the research they had been working on, ranking drug harms, which found Alcohol to be the most costly drug- in the top 5 with heroin, crack cocaine, and tobacco.

We live in a world where many lives are ruined- not because of the substance a person chooses to put in their body- but because of the draconian laws surrounding it.

As we (should have) learned from the 18th ammendment (prohibition, and the 21st ammendment repealing it- prohibition does not work. Drugs are not a criminal justice issue- it is a personal and public health issue- and should be treated as such.

I highly recommend people check out MAPS: Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies , and would also recommendwatching some of thevideos of their Psychedelic Science Conference Videos


About drugsandotherthings

I am a criminal. Because I have used cannabis and psychedelics extensively. I have tried many other drugs, but never cared for the uppers, downers, or dissociatives. I love craft beer, and absinthe, but don't care much for alcohols effects- which quite frankly, are boring and dangerous. Science is my religion. I am in my 40's, and have travelled extensively. And often forced myself outside of my confort zone. I am employed, a respected member of my communtiy, an animal lover, an environmentalist, a political junkie, and the realities I have experienced continue to push me further to the left of the political spectrum.
This entry was posted in drug policy, drug use, politics, social and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Illegal Illegal Drug Laws

  1. kabirvaani says:

    Amerindians belonging to the Native American Church who employ the psychedelic peyote cactus in their rituals, are firmly opposed to any government control of this plant, even if they should be guaranteed the right to its use. They feel that peyote is a natural gift of God to mankind, and especially to natives of the land where it grows, and that no government has a right to interfere with its use The same argument might be made on behalf of cannabis, or the mushroom Psilocybe mexicana Heim. All these things are natural plants, not processed or synthesized drugs, and by what authority can individuals be prevented from eating theme There is no law against eating or growing the mushroom Amanita pantherina, even though it is fatally poisonous and only experts can distinguish it from a common edible mushroom. This case can be made even from the standpoint of believers in the monarchical universe of Judaism and Christianity, for it is a basic principle of both religions, derived from Genesis, that all natural substances created by God are inherently good, and that evil can arise only in their misuse. Thus laws against mere possession, or even cultivation, of these plants are in basic conflict with biblical principles. Criminal conviction of those who employ these plants should be based on proven misuse. “And God said ‘Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed- to you it shall be for meat…. And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good.” —Genesis 1:29, 31.
    – Allan Watts

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s